New Development: The Presidential Election Court Withholds Verdict in Atiku's Lawsuit Against Tinubu
The Presidential Election Petition Court in Abuja has completed its proceedings, reserving judgment in the case brought forward by Atiku Abubakar, who challenged the victory of President Bola Tinubu.
Haruna Tsammani, leading the five-member panel of the court, announced that the date for judgment would be communicated to all involved parties.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had earlier declared President Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the winner of the presidential election held on 25 February. However, Atiku, representing the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), contested the outcome and filed a petition with the court. He sought the nullification of Tinubu's victory, alleging non-compliance with the Nigerian constitution and the Electoral Act.
During the recent court session, INEC's lawyer, Abubakar Mahmoud, urged the court to dismiss Atiku's petition, arguing that it lacked merit. According to Mr. Mahmoud, Atiku failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his allegations of non-compliance with the electoral act and INEC guidelines and regulations.
Mr. Mahmoud defended the use of the Bimodal Voters Accreditation System (BVAS) and INEC Results Viewing (IReV) during the presidential election. He stated that these innovations were successful, and the information generated by BVAS was securely stored on Amazon Web Services (AWS), a reliable platform worldwide. He refuted Atiku's claim that the IReV portal was compromised in favor of Tinubu.
Furthermore, Mr. Mahmoud addressed the issue of electronic transmission of results and the alleged human interference in the election process. He asserted that Atiku and the PDP had fabricated claims of an electronic collation system, which the evidence did not support. He clarified that any glitch in the real-time upload of results lasted for a limited time and had no human interference.
Regarding the statutory requirement of 25% votes in Abuja, Mr. Mahmoud deemed the argument illogical and against the provisions of the Constitution. He argued that the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) should be treated as a state, and there was no case for non-compliance.
In his closing argument, President Tinubu's lead lawyer, Wole Olanipekun, defended the manual collation of the presidential election results. He stated that uploading results to IReV, whether done manually or electronically, did not affect the collation process. According to Mr. Olanipekun, collation was a physical and manual process, and the credibility of the electoral process remained intact.
With the court reserving judgment, all parties await the final decision that will determine the outcome of the presidential election dispute.

Comments
Post a Comment